platonic pluralist’s bits
One classic is: It doesn't seem realistically possible that everybody (or the world, or a certain society etc.) only practises or expresses some (existential) aspects (directly and indirectly, deliberately and non). While leaving the other aspects (from the plural of existential…
CommentShare
NewTopWhat is platonic pluralist’s bits?About
Once, one said: I have an opinion. It is more or less reflected, more or less differentiated or clear-cut. More or less based in experience or conceptu…
CommentShare
(My) platonism (the small p), is basically a form of accepting truth in its plural form. Therefore, as truth is (in this model, concept) a discrete Plu…
CommentShare
Humans are a selective social species. This seems, reductive as it is, a relatively proper description. Better than the general “human is a social bein…
CommentShare
Mathematically (in my estimation), balance cannot be derived. And there is no centre in and of Mathematics. Math knows platonic truths. It knows struct…
CommentShare
The parallelism of aspects thing about this seems to be: Yes, probably, in real* racist systems there is a a lot of denial** by people who ignore the i…
CommentShare
To be polite in a deeper/substantial sense could mean amongst others: To hurt superficial ‘feelings’, to challenge such ideological and outer-layer fee…
CommentShare
This life, you know Jack, is fricking weird. This is why we need a middle class—in the philosophical and social-theoretical sense, not congruent with t…
CommentShare
See all

platonic pluralist’s bits


What is platonic pluralist’s bits?ArchiveAuthorsMy Account
© 2021 platonic_pluralist. See privacy, terms and information collection notice
Publish on Substack
platonic pluralist’s bits is on Substack – the place for independent writing